You are aboard vessel "A" in a narrow channel and the pilot is approaching vessel "B" as shown in illustration D037RR below. Which of the following is the reason he has not previously changed course to the starboard side of the channel?
• Narrow channel shiphandling – how large vessels actually pass each other in confined waters • Effects of bank cushion and bank suction vs. squat in shallow water • Where a pilot prefers to keep the ship (mid‑channel vs. near the bank) before making a meeting maneuver
• In a narrow channel, what hydrodynamic effects act on a ship that gets too close to the bank, and how do they influence course-keeping and safety when another vessel is approaching? • Is the pilot more worried about underwater clearance directly beneath the keel, or about interaction forces between the hull and the channel bank when passing another ship? • Of the four choices, which one most directly explains why the pilot is deliberately delaying the move to starboard rather than describing a general advantage of being in mid‑channel?
• Compare bank cushion / bank suction with squat: which is mainly about sideways forces near the bank, and which is mainly about vertical sinkage due to speed in shallow water? • Ask yourself: just before two ships meet in a narrow channel, which side‑force effect becomes critical if one vessel moves too close to the bank? • Eliminate any options that could be true in many situations but do not specifically explain the timing of the pilot’s course change in this meeting situation.
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!