Within a single sea area, what is the primary reason GMDSS imposes carriage requirements for different radio subsystems?
• GMDSS (Global Maritime Distress and Safety System) design philosophy within one sea area • Difference between redundancy of equipment vs. redundancy of capability • Purpose of using multiple, diverse communication paths (e.g., satellite, VHF, MF/HF)
• Ask yourself: Is GMDSS more focused on having exact duplicate radios, or on ensuring that key distress functions can still be performed if one system fails? • Consider why a ship in one sea area might still use more than one type of communication system—what risk is being reduced? • Which option talks about the combined effect of several systems rather than just obeying a national rule or matching every possible mode?
• Identify which choices talk about full duplication of all functions versus backing up essential capabilities only. • Check which option clearly addresses the problem of a single point of failure in distress alerting and communication. • Eliminate answers that focus mainly on national regulations or being able to use every mode with every station, rather than on overall system reliability and survivability.
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!