Which of the following illustrated expansion valves would be most suitable for use in variable capacity systems rated at 50 tons of refrigeration and over? See illustration GS-RA-24.
⢠Look at how each illustrated valve is controlled: is it a simple direct-acting valve, or a pilotâoperated valve with a separate power element? ⢠For large capacities (50 tons and over), manufacturers usually avoid having the diaphragm directly move a large main seat; they use a pilot valve operating a larger main port. ⢠In variableâcapacity systems, you want a valve that can modulate smoothly over a wide range of loads, not just snap open/closed like a small unit valve.
⢠Which illustration shows a small, compact valve body more suitable for fractionalâton or small tonnage units, and which shows a much larger body with a pilot section and main valve section? ⢠Which design would keep the operating force on the diaphragm and power element relatively small, even though the main valve is passing a very large mass flow of refrigerant? ⢠If the systemâs capacity increases above 50 tons, what limitations would a simple directâacting expansion valve have in terms of diaphragm size and spring force?
⢠Identify which drawing shows two stages of control (a small pilot port plus a separate, larger main valve) rather than a single needle or seat. ⢠Check which valve has a remote sensing bulb and power element clearly arranged to control a separate main valve in a big body casting. ⢠Before choosing, eliminate any valves that look like small directâacting thermostatic expansion valves typically used on lowâtonnage or residential/commercial equipment.
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!