When used together to maximize plant reliability, which of the following maintenance management schemes would be the primary tool in a integrated maintenance management system?
• Difference between planned/scheduled, condition-based (predictive), and corrective/failure-based maintenance • The goal of an integrated maintenance management system: maximize plant reliability and minimize unexpected downtime • Which approach is most useful as the central planning tool, with others used to support it
• Ask yourself: In a real engine room, which type of maintenance would you use to organize most of your work orders and long‑term planning? • Which maintenance scheme is specifically designed to predict problems before they cause failure, and which is mainly reacting after something has already broken? • If all four approaches are used together, which one makes the most sense as the "backbone" of the system, into which the others feed data or exceptions?
• Be clear on definitions of planned/scheduled vs condition-based/predictive vs corrective/failure-based • Focus on the phrase "primary tool" in an integrated system rather than a single standalone method • Eliminate any choices that are mainly reactive (responding after failure) when the objective is to maximize reliability
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!