In interpreting 46 CFR, Subchapter J (Electrical Engineering), what would be considered a 'corrosive location'?
• Review the definition section in 46 CFR Subchapter J (Electrical Engineering) for terms like "corrosive locations" or "corrosive atmosphere." • Think about where salt, chemicals, or constant moisture are most likely to attack metal and electrical equipment on a vessel. • Consider the difference between fresh water vs. salt water and normal moisture vs. heavy condensation or steam in terms of corrosion risk.
• Which of the listed locations would create the most aggressive, continuous attack on electrical equipment over time? • How does salt water exposure compare to simple wetness or humidity in terms of corrosion, according to marine engineering practice? • Is steam itself necessarily corrosive, or is it more about what’s dissolved in the water and how long it stays on surfaces as liquid?"
• Check how 46 CFR Subchapter J distinguishes between wet, damp, and corrosive locations, if those terms are defined separately. • Verify which option clearly involves salt or chemical exposure, not just heat or occasional moisture. • Confirm that the chosen option describes a condition that would reasonably require special corrosion-resistant electrical fittings under the regulations.
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!