In accordance with SOLAS, which of the following best describes the obligation of the Master concerning cargo hold watertight doors?
• Master’s overall safety responsibility under SOLAS for watertight integrity • Difference between maintenance requirements and voyage‑specific checks • When SOLAS explicitly requires a log book entry for doors or openings affecting watertight subdivision
• Ask yourself: which option sounds like a continuous general duty of the Master, rather than a very specific routine or condition? • Compare: does SOLAS usually demand daily testing, or does it focus on having a planned, effective system in place? • Which choices add extra conditions (presence of an officer, specific log entry timing) that might go beyond or more specific than the usual SOLAS wording?
• Check SOLAS provisions on watertight doors and maintenance systems rather than only on operating procedures • Verify whether SOLAS speaks about testing frequency (e.g., daily vs. periodically) for these doors • Confirm exactly where SOLAS requires logbook entries and whether this applies to cargo hold watertight doors in the way some choices describe
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!