A periodic thorough examination of the cargo gear proves satisfactory. What percentage of the total gear must be dismantled to determine actual internal condition?
• Cargo gear periodic thorough examination requirements under U.S. or international regulations • Difference between an external visual exam and checking the internal condition of gear components • How sampling (examining a portion of items) is used to represent the condition of the entire system
• If an exam is already "thorough" and found satisfactory, why might regulations still require dismantling some percentage of the gear? • Would regulations be more likely to require dismantling all, none, or a sample portion of the gear when the external condition is satisfactory? • Between small (10%), moderate (25%), and all (100%), which percentage best fits a representative sample that balances safety with practicality?
• Confirm that the question is about a periodic thorough examination that has already proved satisfactory externally • Think about which choice represents a sampling inspection rather than no dismantling or complete dismantling • Ask yourself which percentage is commonly used in regulations as a representative portion of equipment to be opened up for internal inspection
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!