A structurally serviceable freight container...

Study

Question 1 of 2066636ee728f7522a1c518b3f

A structurally serviceable freight container loaded with Class 1 explosive materials cannot have a major defect in its strength components. Which of the following would make a container non- serviceable?

Back

Question 1 of 20

66636ee728f7522a1c518b3f

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!

If the question has a related picture, it will appear here.

🔍 Key Concepts

• Structurally serviceable container criteria for hazardous materials, especially Class 1 explosives • How a major defect in strength components is defined (think about depth AND severity) • Difference between very small surface damage vs. significant structural deformation

💭 Think About

• Look at the two different depth values in the choices. Which one represents very small, possibly cosmetic damage, and which one suggests serious deformation? • Think about how strict the standards must be for containers carrying Class 1 explosives. Would the rule focus on the larger or smaller deformation as a cutoff for being non‑serviceable? • Compare the wording: greater than vs. less than. Which combination of depth and comparison would indicate a clearly unacceptable condition for strength members?

✅ Before You Answer

• Identify which depth measurement is an order of magnitude larger than the other and consider its structural impact. • Confirm that a major defect is something that could compromise the container’s ability to withstand normal handling loads, not just appearance. • Before picking an option, double‑check whether the condition described would likely be considered cosmetic or structurally significant for explosive cargo.

👋 Hi! I'm Genie, your AI study assistant. How can I help you with this question?

Quick actions

— No credit card needed